4.7 Article

Prevention of Diabetes by FTY720-Mediated Stabilization of Pen-Islet Tertiary Lymphoid Organs

期刊

DIABETES
卷 59, 期 6, 页码 1461-1468

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db09-1129

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R37 AI-46643, P30 DK-63720]
  2. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation
  3. National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) [1 R25 GM56847]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE-The nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse is a well-established mouse model of spontaneous type I diabetes, which is characterized by an autoimmune destruction of the insulin-secreting pancreatic beta-cells. In this study, we address the role of tertiary lymphoid organs (TLOs) that form in the pancreas of NOD mice during disease progression. METHODS-We developed a model designed to lock lymphocytes in the pancreatic lymph node (PLN) and pancreas by the use of FTY720, which blocks the exit of lymphocytes from lymph nodes. A combination of flow cytometry, immunofluorescence, and analysis of clinical scores was used to study the effects of long-term FTY720 treatment on TLO development and development of diabetes. RESULTS-Continuous treatment of NOD mice with FTY720 prevented diabetes development even at a time of significant insulitis. Treatment withdrawal led to accelerated disease independent of the PLN. Interestingly, naive T-cells trafficked to and proliferated in the TLOs. In addition, morphological changes were observed that occurred during the development of the disease. Remarkably, although the infiltrates are not organized into T/B-cell compartments in 8-week-old mice, by 20 weeks of age, and in age-matched mice undergoing FTY720 treatment, the infiltrates showed a high degree of organization. However, in naturally and FTY720-induced diabetic mice, T/B-cell compartmentalization was lost. CONCLUSION-Our data show that TLOs are established during diabetes development and suggest that islet destruction is due to a loss of TLO integrity, which may be prevented by FTY720 treatment. Diabetes 59:1461-1468, 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据