4.7 Article

Interleukin-21 Is Required for the Development of Type 1 Diabetes in NOD Mice

期刊

DIABETES
卷 58, 期 5, 页码 1144-1155

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db08-0882

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  2. Belgian American Educational Foundation
  3. Brehm Center for Type 1 Diabetes Research and Analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE-Interleukin (IL)-21 is a type 1 cytokine that has been implicated in the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes via the unique biology of the nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse strain. The aim of this study was to investigate a causal role for IL-21 in type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-We generated IL-21R-deficient NOD mice and C57Bl/6 mice expressing IL-21 in pancreatic beta-cells, allowing the determination of the role of insufficient and excessive IL-21 signaling in type 1 diabetes. RESULTS-Deficiency in IL-21R expression renders NOD mice resistant to insulitis, production of insulin autoantibodies, and onset of type 1 diabetes. The lymphoid compartment in IL-21R(-/-) NOD is normal and does not contain an increased regulatory T-cell fraction or diminished effector cytokine responses. However, we observed a clear defect in autoreactive effector T-cells in IL-21R(-/-) NOD by transfer experiments. Conversely, overexpression of IL-21 in pancreatic beta-cells induced inflammatory cytokine and chemokines, including IL-17A, IL17F, IFN-gamma, monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, MCP-2, and interferon-inducible protein-10 in the pancreas. The ensuing leukocytic infiltration in the islets resulted in destruction of beta-cells and spontaneous type 1 diabetes in the normally diabetes-resistant C57Bl/6 and NOD X C57Bl/6 backgrounds. CONCLUSIONS-This work provides demonstration of the essential prodiabetogenic activities of 11,21 on diverse genetic backgrounds (NOD and C57BL/6) and indicates that IL-21 blockade could be a promising strategy for interventions in human type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 58:1144-1155, 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据