4.7 Article

Elevated Triglycerides Correlate With Progression of Diabetic Neuropathy

期刊

DIABETES
卷 58, 期 7, 页码 1634-1640

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db08-1771

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [U54-DA021519, U54 DA021519] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK43884] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [NS04765] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE-To evaluate mechanisms underlying diabetic neuropathy progression using indexes of sural nerve morphometry obtained from two identical randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-Sural nerve myelinated fiber density (MFD), nerve conduction velocities (NCVs), vibration perception thresholds, clinical symptom scores, and a visual analog scale for pain were analyzed in participants with diabetic neuropathy. A loss of >= 500 fibers/mm(2) in sural nerve MFD over 52 weeks was defined as progressing diabetic neuropathy, and a MFD loss of :5100 fibers/mm2 during the same time interval as nonprogressing diabetic neuropathy. The progressing and nonprogressing cohorts were matched for baseline characteristics using an O'Brien rank-sum and baseline MFD. RESULTS-At 52 weeks, the progressing cohort demonstrated a 25% decrease (P < 0.0001) from baseline in MFD, while the nonprogressing cohort remained unchanged. MFD was not affected by active drug treatment (P = 0.87), diabetes duration (P = 0.48), age (P = 0.11), or BMI (P = 0.30). Among all variables tested, elevated triglycerides and decreased peroneal motor NCV at baseline significantly correlated with loss of MFD at 52 weeks (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS-In this cohort of participants with mild to moderate diabetic neuropathy, elevated triglycerides correlated with MFD loss independent of disease duration, age, diabetes control, or other variables. These data support the evolving concept that hyperlipidemia is instrumental in the progression of diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes 58:1634-1640, 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据