4.7 Article

Successful Versus Failed Adaptation to High-Fat Diet-Induced Insulin Resistance The Role of IAPP-Induced β-Cell Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress

期刊

DIABETES
卷 58, 期 4, 页码 906-916

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db08-1464

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [DK59579]
  2. Larry Hillblom Foundation
  3. NIH Ruth L. Mrschstein National Research Service Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE-Obesity is a known risk factor for type 2 diabetes. However, most obese individuals do not develop diabetes because they adapt to insulin resistance by increasing beta-cell mass and insulin secretion. Islet pathology in type 2 diabetes is characterized by beta-cell loss, islet amyloid derived from islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP), and increased beta-cell apoptosis characterized by endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. We hypothesized that IAPP-induced ER stress distinguishes successful versus unsuccessful islet adaptation to insulin resistance. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-To address this, we fed wild-type (WT) and human LAPP transgenic (HIP) rats either 10 weeks of regular chow or a high-fat diet and prospectively examined the relations among beta-cell mass and turnover, beta-cell ER stress, insulin secretion, and insulin sensitivity. RESULTS-A high-fat diet led to comparable insulin resistance in WT and HIP rats. WT rats compensated with increased insulin secretion and beta-cell mass. In HIP rats, in contrast, neither beta-cell function nor mass compensated for the increased insulin demand, leading to diabetes. The failure to increase beta-cell mass in HIP rats was the result of ER stress-induced beta-cell apoptosis that increased in proportion to diet-induced insulin resistance. CONCLUSIONS-IAPP-induced ER stress distinguishes the successful versus unsuccessful islet adaptation to a high-fat diet in rats. These studies are consistent with the hypothesis that LAPP oligomers contribute to increased beta-cell apoptosis and beta-cell failure in humans with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 58: 906-916, 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据