4.7 Article

Fat Mass- and Obesity-Associated (FTO) Gene Variant Is Associated With Obesity Longitudinal Analyses in Two Cohort Studies and Functional Test

期刊

DIABETES
卷 57, 期 11, 页码 3145-3151

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db08-0006

关键词

-

资金

  1. American Heart Association
  2. Boston Obesity Nutrition Research Center [DK46200]
  3. National Institutes of Health [DK-58845, CA-87969]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE-To examine the longitudinal association of fat, mass- and obesity-associated (FTO) variant with obesity, circulating adipokine levels, and FTO expression in various materials from human and mouse. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-We genotyped rs9939609 in 2,287 men and 3,520 women from two prospective cohorts. Plasma adiponectin and leptin were measured in a subset of diabetic men (n = 854) and women (n = 987). Expression of FTO was tested in adipocytes from db/db mice and mouse macrophages. RESULTS-We observed a trend toward decreasing associations between rs9939609 and BMI at older age ( >= 65 years) in men, whereas the associations were constant across different age groups in women. In addition, the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs9939609 was associated with lower plasma adiponectin (log[e]- means, 1.82 +/- 0.04, 1.73 +/- 0.03, and 1.68 +/- 0.05 for TT, TA, and AA genotypes, respectively; P for trend 0.02) and leptin (log[e]- means, 3.56 +/- 0.04, 3.63 +/- 0.04, and 3.70 +/- 0.06; P for trend = 0.06) in diabetic women. Adjustment for BMI attenuated the associations. FTO gene was universally expressed in human and mice tissues, including adipocytes. In an ancillary study of adipocytes from db/db mice, FTO expression was similar to 50% lower than in those from wild-type mice. CONCLUSIONS-The association between FTO SNP rs9939609 and obesity risk may decline at older age. The variant affects circulating adiponectin and leptin levels through the changes in BMI. In addition, the expression of FTO gene was reduced in adipocytes from db/db mice. Diabetes 57:3145-3151, 2008

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据