4.7 Article

Serum heat shock protein 27 and diabetes complications in the EURODUB Prospective Complications Study: A novel circulating marker for diabetic neuropathy

期刊

DIABETES
卷 57, 期 7, 页码 1966-1970

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db08-0009

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [G0501184] Funding Source: Medline
  2. MRC [G0501184] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [G0501184] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE-Heat shock protein 27 (HSP27) is a member of the small heat shock protein family of proteins. HSP27 expression is enhanced in target tissues of diabetic microvascular complications, and changes in circulating serum HSP27 levels (sHSP27) have been reported in patients with macrovascular disease. We investigated whether sHSP27 levels were associated with micro- and macrovascular complications in type 1 diabetic patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-A cross-sectional, nested, case-control study from the EURODLAB Prospective Complications Study of 531 type 1 diabetic patients was performed. Case subjects (n = 363) were defined as those with one or more complications of diabetes; control subjects (n = 168) were defined as those with no evidence of any complication. We measured sHSP27 levels and investigated their associations with diabetes complications. RESULTS-Mean sHSP27 levels were significantly higher in case subjects with distal symmetrical polyneuropathy (DSP) than in control subjects, even after adjustment for age and albumin excretion rate (AER) (785.9 vs. 574.7 pg/ml, P = 0.03). In logistic regression analysis, sHSP27 levels in the upper quartile were associated with a twofold increased odds ratio (OR) of DSP, independently of conventional risk factors, markers of inflammation, and AER (OR 2.41 [959/o CI 1.11-5.24]). CONCLUSIONS-In this large cohort of type 1 diabetic subjects, we found an independent association between sHSP27 and DSP. This suggests that sHSP27 levels may be a novel marker for diabetic neuropathy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据