4.5 Article

Setting a patient-centered research agenda for cerebral palsy: a participatory action research initiative

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY
卷 60, 期 12, 页码 1278-+

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.13984

关键词

-

资金

  1. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  2. American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine
  3. Cerebral Palsy Research Network (CPRN)
  4. CP NOW
  5. Cerebral Palsy Alliance Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim Method To establish a patient-centered research agenda for cerebral palsy (CP). We engaged a large cross-section of the extended community of people living with CP and those providing healthcare to people with CP ('the community') in an educational series and collaborative survey platform to establish an initial list of prioritized research ideas. After online workshops, a facilitated Delphi process was used to select the 20 highest priorities. Select participants attended an in-person workshop to provide comment and work toward consensus of research priorities. Results Interpretation A research agenda for CP was developed by the community, which included consumers, clinicians, and researchers interested in advancing the established research agenda. The results included the top 16 research concepts produced by the process to shape and steward the research agenda, and an engaged cross-section of the community. It has been shown that proactively engaging consumers with clinical researchers may provide more meaningful research for the community. This study suggests that future research should have more focus on interventions and outcomes across the lifespan with increased emphasis on the following outcome measures: function, quality of life, and participation. What this paper adds Resumen A patient-centered research agenda for cerebral palsy was established. Comparative effectiveness of interventions, physical activity, and understanding ageing were leading themes. Longitudinal studies across the lifespan, clinical spectrum, and ages were highly ranked. Participants reported high value for participation outcomes. Participants reported great appreciation for the engagement between consumers and clinician researchers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据