4.5 Article

Prevalence and risk factors for neurological disorders in children aged 6months to 2 years in northern India

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY
卷 55, 期 4, 页码 348-356

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.12079

关键词

-

资金

  1. Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi [5/4-5/9/2005 - NCD]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim To study prevalence and risk factors for neurological disorders epilepsy, global developmental delay, and motor, vision, and hearing defects in children aged 6months to 2years in northern India. Method A two-stage community survey for neurological disorders was conducted in rural and urban areas of Lucknow. After initial screening with a new instrument, the Lucknow Neurodevelopment Screen, screen positives and a random proportion of screen negatives were validated using predefined criteria. Prevalence was calculated by weighted estimates. Demographic, socio-economic, and medical risk factors were compared between validated children who were positive and negative for neurological disorders by univariate and logistic regression analysis. Results Of 4801 children screened (mean age [SD] 15.32mo [5.96]; 2542 males, 2259 females), 196 were positive; 190 screen positives and 269 screen negatives were validated. Prevalence of neurological disorders was 27.92 per 1000 (weighted 95% confidence interval 12.2443.60). Significant risk factors (p0.01) for neurological disorders were higher age in months (p=0.010), lower mean number of appliances in the household (p=0.001), consanguineous marriage of parents (p=0.010), family history of neurological disorder (p=0.001), and infants born exceptionally small (parental description; p=0.009). On logistic regression, the final model included age (p=0.0193), number of appliances (p=0.0161), delayed cry at birth (p=0.0270), postneonatal meningoencephalitis (p=0.0549), and consanguinity (p=0.0801). Interpretation Perinatal factors, lower socio-economic status, and consanguinity emerged as predictors of neurological disorders. These factors are largely modifiable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据