4.5 Review

Challenges and limitations in early intervention

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04064.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Johanna KinderFonds
  2. Stichting Fonds de Gavere
  3. Cornelia Stichting
  4. ZonMW
  5. Stichting Rotterdams Kinderrevalidatie Fonds Adriaanstichting
  6. Phelpsstichting
  7. Revalidatiefonds
  8. Revalidatie Nederland
  9. Nederlandse Vereniging van Revalidatieartsen
  10. Graduate School for Behavioural and Cognitive Neurosciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research over the past three decades has shown that early intervention in infants biologically at risk of developmental disorders, irrespective of the presence of a brain lesion, is associated with improved cognitive development in early childhood without affecting motor development. However, at present it is unknown whether early intervention is also able to improve developmental outcome in infants with a serious lesion of the brain. This paper discusses factors that might play a role in the effect of early intervention. The following picture emerged from the limited evidence available: (1) coaching of parents seems an effective means of intervention; (2) our understanding of the plasticity of the developing human brain is currently too limited to allow a direct practical implementation in early intervention; (3) intervention before term age should primarily focus on stress reduction, intervention after term age on stimulation of infant development; and (4) our knowledge of the best ways to stimulate infant development is scant. Nevertheless, preliminary data suggest that offering the infant ample opportunities to explore by self-produced motor activities the borders of their own abilities might be a good strategy for promoting developmental outcome, including functional mobility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据