4.5 Article

Generation and Characterization of Osteochondral Grafts With Human Nasal Chondrocytes

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
卷 33, 期 8, 页码 1111-1119

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jor.22865

关键词

tissue engineering; osteochondral lesion; chondrocytes; dGEMRIC; chondrogenic differentiation

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [310030-126965.1]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [310030_126965] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated whether nasal chondrocytes (NC) can be used to generate composite constructs with properties necessary for the repair of osteochondral (OC) lesions, namely maturation, integration and capacity to recover from inflammatory burst. OC grafts were fabricated by combining engineered cartilage tissues (generated by culturing NC or articular chondrocytes - AC - onto Chondro-Gide (R) matrices) with devitalized spongiosa cylinders (Tutobone (R)). OC tissues were then exposed to IL-1 beta for three days and cultured for additional 2 weeks in the absence of IL-1 beta. Cartilage maturation extent was assessed (immune) histologically, biochemically and by delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) while cartilage/bone integration was assessed using a peel-off mechanical test. The use of NC as compared to AC allowed for more efficient cartilage matrix accumulation and superior integration of the cartilage/bone layers. dGEMRIC and biochemical analyzes of the OC constructs showed a reduced glycosaminoglycan (GAG) contents upon IL-1 beta administration. Cartilaginous matrix contents and integration forces returned to baseline up on withdrawal of IL-1 beta. By having a cartilage layer well developed and strongly integrated to the subchondral layer, OC tissues generated with NC may successfully engraft in an inflammatory post-surgery joint environment. (C) 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据