4.4 Article

Left Atrial Ligation Alters Intracardiac Flow Patterns and the Biomechanical Landscape in the Chick Embryo

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL DYNAMICS
卷 243, 期 5, 页码 652-662

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.24107

关键词

hemodynamics; cardiac development; hypoplastic left heart syndrome; computational fluid dynamics

资金

  1. NSF [0954465]
  2. Kosair Charities Pediatric Heart Research Program
  3. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  4. Directorate For Engineering [0954465] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) is a major human congenital heart defect that results in single ventricle physiology and high mortality. Clinical data indicate that intracardiac blood flow patterns during cardiac morphogenesis are a significant etiology. We used the left atrial ligation (LAL) model in the chick embryo to test the hypothesis that LAL immediately alters intracardiac flow streams and the biomechanical environment, preceding morphologic and structural defects observed in HLHS. Results: Using fluorescent dye injections, we found that intracardiac flow patterns from the right common cardinal vein, right vitelline vein, and left vitelline vein were altered immediately following LAL. Furthermore, we quantified a significant ventral shift of the right common cardinal and right vitelline vein flow streams. We developed an in silico model of LAL, which revealed that wall shear stress was reduced at the left atrioventricular canal and left side of the common ventricle. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that intracardiac flow patterns change immediately following LAL, supporting the role of hemodynamics in the progression of HLHS. Sites of reduced WSS revealed by computational modeling are commonly affected in HLHS, suggesting that changes in the biomechanical environment may lead to abnormal growth and remodeling of left heart structures. Developmental Dynamics 243:652-662, 2014. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据