4.7 Article

ETS Factors Regulate Vegf-Dependent Arterial Specification

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL CELL
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 45-58

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.06.007

关键词

-

资金

  1. American Heart Association [12SDG12060353]
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [5T32-HL007544, 5T32-HL007731-20, PO1 HL76540, HL54737]
  3. California Institute of Regenerative Medicine [TG2-01160]
  4. Packard Foundation
  5. NHLBI [P01 HL089707, HL64658]
  6. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP-119506]
  7. Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation
  8. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  9. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
  10. American Heart Association, Western States Affiliate [12PILT12670005]
  11. Lawrence J. and Florence A. DeGeorge Charitable Trust/American Heart Association
  12. NIH/NCRR [C06 RR018928]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vegf signaling specifies arterial fate during early vascular development by inducing the transcription of Delta-like 4 (Dll4), the earliest Notch ligand gene expressed in arterial precursor cells. Dll4 expression precedes that of Notch receptors in arteries, and factors that direct its arterial-specific expression are not known. To identify the transcriptional program that initiates arterial Dll4 expression, we characterized an arterial-specific and Vegf-responsive enhancer of Dll4. Our findings demonstrate that Notch signaling is not required for initiation of Dll4 expression in arteries and suggest that Notch instead functions as a maintenance factor. Importantly, we find that Vegf signaling activates MAP kinase (MAPK)-dependent E26 transformation-specific sequence (ETS) factors in the arterial endothelium to drive expression of Dll4 and Notch4. These findings identify a Vegf/MAPK-dependent transcriptional pathway that specifies arterial identity by activating Notch signaling components and illustrate how signaling cascades can modulate broadly expressed transcription factors to achieve tissue-specific transcriptional outputs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据