4.7 Article

Structural and Functional Studies of LRP6 Ectodomain Reveal a Platform for Wnt Signaling

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL CELL
卷 21, 期 5, 页码 848-861

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.09.007

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cancer Research UK
  2. Wellcome Trust
  3. UK Medical Research Council
  4. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [SAF2008-00451, SAF2011-22988]
  5. Red Tematica de Investigacion Cooperativa en Cancer [RD06/0020/1001]
  6. Children's Hospital Boston Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center/National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [P30 HD-18655]
  7. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [RO1 GM074241]
  8. Chinese Ministry of Education-University of Oxford
  9. EMBO
  10. Medical Research Council [G0700232] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. MRC [G0700232] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

LDL-receptor-related protein 6 (LRP6), alongside Frizzled receptors, transduces Wnt signaling across the plasma membrane. The LRP6 ectodomain comprises four tandem beta-propeller-EGF-like domain (PE) pairs that harbor binding sites for Wnt morphogens and their antagonists including Dickkopf 1 (Dkkl). To understand how these multiple interactions are integrated, we combined crystallographic analysis of the third and fourth PE pairs with electron microscopy (EM) to determine the complete ectodomain structure. An extensive inter-pair interface, conserved for the first-to-second and third-to-fourth PE interactions, contributes to a compact platform-like architecture, which is disrupted by mutations implicated in developmental diseases. EM reconstruction of the LRP6 platform bound to chaperone Mesd exemplifies a binding mode spanning PE pairs. Cellular and binding assays identify overlapping Wnt3a- and Dkk1-binding surfaces on the third PE pair, consistent with steric competition, but also suggest a model in which the platform structure supports an interplay of ligands through multiple interaction sites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据