4.4 Article

Bantam is essential for Drosophila intestinal stem cell proliferation in response to Hippo signaling

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 385, 期 2, 页码 211-219

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.11.008

关键词

Bantam; MicroRNA; Drosophila; Intestinal stem cell; Hippo pathway

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2010CB912101, 2012CB945001, 2011CB943902]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA01010406, XDA01010405]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31171394, 31371462, 31171414, 31371492]
  4. National Key Basic Research and Development Program of China [2011CB915502]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Drosophila midgut has emerged as an attractive model system to study stem cell biology. Extensive studies have been carried out to investigate the mechanisms of how the signaling pathways integrate to regulate intestinal stem cells (ISCs), yet, whether the microRNAs are involved in ISC self-renewal and maintenance is unknown. Here we demonstrate that the bantam microRNA is expressed specifically at high levels in Drosophila midgut precursor cells (including ISCs and enteroblasts) and secretory enteroendocrine cells while at extremely low levels in enterocytes. Furthermore, overexpression of bantam microRNA results in increase of the division of the midgut precursor cells, whereas loss of bantam microRNA decreases their proliferation. The mechanical studies show that bantam microRNA is essential for the Hpo pathway induced cell-autonomous ISC self-renewal, while it is disposable for EGFR and Notch pathways mediated ISC proliferation. More interestingly, we find that bantam microRNA is not required for the Hpo pathway mediated non-cell-autonomous ISC proliferation, revealing a novel mechanism by which the Hpo signaling pathway specifies its transcriptional targets in specific tissue to exhibit its biological functions. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据