4.4 Article

Caspase 9 is constitutively activated in mouse oocytes and plays a key role in oocyte elimination during meiotic prophase progression

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 377, 期 1, 页码 213-223

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.01.027

关键词

Oocyte; Apoptosis; Caspase 9; Msh5; PARP1

资金

  1. Canadian Institute for Health Research [MOP-14801]
  2. National Institute of Health [1R01CA76329]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In many mammalian species, more than half of the initial oocyte population is eliminated by neonatal life, thus limiting the oocyte reserve for reproduction. The cause or mechanism of this major oocyte loss remains poorly understood. We examined the apoptotic pathway involved in oocyte elimination in wild-type mouse ovaries as well as in Msh5 -/- ovaries, in which all oocytes were eliminated due to a lack of double strand break repair. Immunoblot and immunofluorescence staining showed that an initiator caspase 9 and an effector caspase 7 were constitutively activated in almost all oocytes in fetal ovaries regardless of their genotypes. In caspase 9 -/- ovaries, the total number of oocytes remained high while that in wild-type ovaries steadily declined during ovarian development. Therefore, the activation of caspase 9 was required for but did not immediately lead to oocyte demise. We found that XIAP, an endogenous inhibitor of apoptosis, was also abundant in oocytes during meiotic prophase progression. On the other hand, a cleaved form of PARP1, a target of effector caspases, was localized to the nuclei of a limited number of oocytes, and the frequency of cleaved PARP1-positive oocyte nuclei increased significantly higher before all oocytes disappeared in Msh5 -/- ovaries. We conclude that the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway mediated by caspase 9 is constitutively activated in oocytes and renders the elimination of oocytes with meiotic errors, which can be captured by the cleavage of PARP1. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据