4.4 Article

Ndrg2 regulates vertebral specification in differentiating somites

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 369, 期 2, 页码 308-318

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.07.001

关键词

Ndrg2; Vertebral patterning; Differentiating somites; Homeotic transformation; Hox genes; Bmp/Smad signaling

资金

  1. National Major Fundamental Research 973 program of China [2007(sic)B947301, 2012CB966903]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31171396, 81121001, 31100624]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is generally thought that vertebral patterning and identity are globally determined prior to somite formation. Relatively little is known about the regulators of vertebral specification after somite segmentation. Here, we demonstrated that Ndrg2, a tumor suppressor gene, was dynamically expressed in the presomitic mesoderm (PSM) and at early stage of differentiating somites. Loss of Ndrg2 in mice resulted in vertebral homeotic transformations in thoracic/lumbar and lumbar/sacral transitional regions in a dose-dependent manner. Interestingly, the inactivation of Ndrg2 in osteoblasts or chondrocytes caused defects resembling those observed in Ndrg2(-/-) mice, with a lower penetrance. In addition, forced overexpression of Ndrg2 in osteoblasts or chondrocytes also conferred vertebral defects, which were distinct from those in Ndrg2(-/-) mice. These genetic analyses revealed that Ndrg2 modulates vertebral identity in segmented somites rather than in the PSM. At the molecular level, combinatory alterations of the amount of Hoxc8-11 gene transcripts were detected in the differentiating somites of Ndrg2(-/-) embryos, which may partially account for the vertebral defects in Ndrg2 mutants. Nevertheless, Bmp/Smad signaling activity was elevated in the differentiating somites of Ndrg2(-/-) embryos. Collectively, our findings unveiled Ndrg2 as a novel regulator of vertebral specification in differentiating somites. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据