4.4 Article

Dicer is required for survival of differentiating neural crest cells

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 340, 期 2, 页码 459-467

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.01.039

关键词

Dicer; miRNA; Neural crest; Peripheral nervous system; Apoptosis

资金

  1. AHA (SDG)
  2. NSF [IOS-0529746, MCB-0529746]
  3. NIH [NS15547]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The neural crest (NC) lineage gives rise to a wide array of cell types ranging from neurons and glia of the peripheral nervous system to skeletal elements of the head. The mechanisms regulating NC differentiation into such a large number of cell types remain largely unknown. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play key roles in regulating developmental events suggesting they may also play a role during NC differentiation. To determine what roles miRNAs play in differentiation of NC-derived tissues, we deleted the miRNA processing gene Dicer in NC cells using the Wnt1-Cre deleter line. We show that deletion of Dicer soon after NC cells have formed does not affect their migration and colonization of their targets in the embryo. However, the post-migratory NC is dependent on Dicer for survival. In the head, loss of Dicer leads to a loss of NC-derived craniofacial bones while in the trunk, cells of the enteric, sensory and sympathetic nervous systems are lost during development. We found that loss of Dicer does not prevent the initial differentiation of NC but as development progresses. NC derivatives are lost due to apoptotic cell death. When Dicer is deleted, both Caspase-dependent and -independent apoptotic pathways are activated in the sensory ganglia but only the Caspase-dependent apoptotic program was activated in the sympathetic nervous system showing that the specific endogenous apoptotic programs are turned on by loss of Dicer. Our results show that Dicer and miRNAs, are required for survival of NC-derived tissues by preventing apoptosis during differentiation. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据