4.4 Article

Germ layer specification and axial patterning in the embryonic development of the freshwater planarian Schmidtea polychroa

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 340, 期 1, 页码 145-158

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.01.018

关键词

Planarian; Embryo; Patterning; Gastrulation; Germ layers; Polarity; Regeneration

资金

  1. MEC, Spain [BFU-2007-63209]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although patterning during regeneration in adult planarians has been studied extensively, very little is known about how the initial planarian body plan arises during embryogenesis. Herein, we analyze the process of embryo patterning in the species Schmidtea polychroa by comparing the expression of genes involved in the establishment of the metazoan body plan. Planarians present a derived ectolecithic spiralian development characterized by dispersed cleavage within a yolk syncytium and an early transient embryo capable of feeding on the maternally supplied yolk cells. During this stage of development, we only found evidence of canonical Wnt pathway, mostly associated with the development of its transient pharynx. At these stages, genes involved in gastrulation (snail) and germ layer determination (foxA and twist) are specifically expressed in migrating blastomeres and those giving rise to the temporary gut and pharyngeal muscle. After yolk ingestion, the embryo expresses core components of the canonical Wnt pathway and the BMP pathway, suggesting that the definitive axial identities are established late. These data support the division of planarian development into two separate morphogenetic stages: a highly divergent gastrulation stage, which segregates the three germ layers and establishes the primary organization of the feeding embryo: and subsequent metamorphosis, based on totipotent blastomeres, which establishes the definitive adult body plan using mechanisms that are similar to those used during regeneration and homeostasis in the adult. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据