4.4 Article

The N- or C-terminal domains of DSH-2 can activate the C. elegans Wnt/β-catenin asymmetry pathway

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 328, 期 2, 页码 234-244

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.01.017

关键词

C. elegans; Dishevelled; Morphogenesis

资金

  1. NSF [IOB0518081]
  2. NIH [T32 GM07215]
  3. NIH Predoctoral Training Grant in Genetics [T32GM007133]
  4. Caenorhabditis Genetics Center
  5. NIH National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dishevelleds are modular proteins that lie at the crossroads of divergent Wnt signaling pathways. The DIX domain of dishevelleds modulates a beta-catenin destruction complex, and thereby mediates cell fate decisions through differential activation of Tcf transcription factors. The DEP domain of dishevelleds mediates planar polarity of cells within a sheet through regulation of actin modulators. In Caenorhabditis elegans asymmetric cell fate decisions are regulated by asymmetric localization of signaling components in a pathway termed the Wnt/beta-catenin asymmetry pathway. Which domain(s) of Disheveled regulate this pathway is unknown. We show that C. elegans embryos from dsh-2(or302) mutant mothers fail to successfully undergo morphogenesis, but transgenes containing either the DIX or the DEP domain of DSH-2 are sufficient to rescue the mutant phenotype. Embryos lacking zygotic function of SYS-1/beta-catenin, WRM-1/beta-catenin, or POP-1/Tcf show defects similar to dsh-2 mutants, including a loss of asymmetry in some cell fate decisions. Removal of two dishevelleds (dsh-2 and mig-5) leads to a global loss of POP-1 asymmetry, which can be rescued by addition of transgenes containing either the DIX or DEP domain of DSH-2. These results indicate that either the DIX or DEP domain of DSH-2 is capable of activating the Wnt/beta-catenin asymmetry pathway and regulating anterior-posterior fate decisions required for proper morphogenesis. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据