4.4 Article

Phosphorylation of Gli2 by protein kinase A is required for Gli2 processing and degradation and the Sonic Hedgehog-regulated mouse development

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 326, 期 1, 页码 177-189

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.11.009

关键词

Gli2; Hedgehog; Neural tube

资金

  1. NIH [ROIGM070820]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In mice, Gli2 and Gli3 are the transcription factors that mediate the initial Hedgehog (Hh) signaling. In the absence of Hh signaling, the majority of the full-length GIB protein undergoes proteolytic processing into a repressor, while only, small fraction of the full-length Gli2 protein is processed. Gli3 processing is dependent on phosphorylation of the first four of the six protein kinase A (PKA) sites at its C-terminus. However, whether the same phosphorylation of Gli2 by PKA is required for Gli2 processing and, if so, whether such phosphorylation regulates additional Gli2 function are unknown. To addresser these questions, we mutated these PKA sites in the mouse Gli2 locus to create the Gli2 allele. Gli2 homozygous embryos die in utero and exhibit exencephaly, defects in neural tube closure, enlarged craniofacial structures, and an extra anterior digit. Analysis of spinal cord patterning shows that domains of motoneurons and V2, V1, and V0 interneurons are expanded to different degrees in both Gli2(P1-4) single and Gli2(P1-4);Shh double mutants. Furthermore, Gli2(P1-4) expression prevents massive cell death and promotes cell proliferation in Shh mutant. Analysis of Gli2(P1-4) protein in vivo reveals that the mutant protein is not processed and is twice as stable as wild type Gli2 protein. We also show that the Gli2 repressor can effectively antagonize Gli2(P1-4) activity. Together, these results indicate that phosphorylation of Gli2 by PKA induces Gli2 processing and destabilization in vivo and plays an important: role in the Hh-regulated mouse embryonic patterning. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据