4.4 Article

Dynamic regulation of retinoic acid-binding proteins in developing, adult and neoplastic skin reveals roles for β-catenin and Notch signalling

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 324, 期 1, 页码 55-67

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.08.034

关键词

Retinoic acid; CRABP1; CRABP2; FABP5; Skin; Hair follicle; Sebaceous gland; Dermal papilla; beta-catenin; Notch

资金

  1. Herchel Smith Postdoctoral Research Fellowship
  2. Evans-Freke Next Generation Junior Research Fellowship
  3. Wellcome Trust
  4. Medical Research Council
  5. Cancer Research UK

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Retinoic acid (RA) signalling is essential for epidermal differentiation; however, the mechanisms by which it acts are largely unexplored. Partitioning of RA between different nuclear receptors is regulated by RA-binding proteins. We show that cellular RA-binding proteins CRAB1 and CRABP2 and the fatty acid-binding protein FABP5 are dynamically expressed during skin development and in adult tissue. CRAB1 is expressed in embryonic dermis and in the stroma of skin tumours, but confined to the hair follicle dermal papilla in normal postnatal skin. CRABP2 and FABP5 are expressed in the differentiating cells of sebaceous gland, interfollicular epidermis and hair follicles, with FABP5 being a prominent marker of sebaceous glands and anagen follicle bulbs. All three proteins are upregulated in response to RA treatment or Notch activation and are negatively regulated by Wnt/beta-catenin signalling. Ectopic follicles induced by beta-catenin arise from areas of the sebaceous gland that have lost CRABP2 and FABP5: conversely, inhibition of hair follicle formation by N-terminally truncated Lef1 results in upregulation of CRABP2 and FABP5. Our findings demonstrate that there is dynamic regulation of RA signalling in different regions of the skin and provide evidence for interactions between the RA, beta-catenin and Notch pathways. (C) 2008 Elsevier in. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据