4.4 Article

Reiterative roles for FGF signaling in the establishment of size and proportion of the zebrafish heart

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 321, 期 2, 页码 397-406

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.06.033

关键词

zebrafish; organogenesis; heart development; chamber formation; ventricle; atrium; FGF; Fgf8; acerebellar

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL069594-07, R01 HL069594-04, R01 HL069594-06, R01 HL069594-03, R01 HL081674-03, R01 HL069594-02, R01 HL069594-01, R01 HL069594-05A1, R01 HL081674, R01 HL069594] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Development of a functional organ requires the establishment of its proper size as well as the establishment of the relative proportions of its individual components. In the zebrafish heart, organ size and proportion depend heavily on the number of cells in each of its two major chambers, the ventricle and the atrium. Heart size and chamber proportionality are both affected in zebrafish fgf8 mutants. To determine when and how FGF signaling influences these characteristics, we examined the effect of temporally controlled pathway inhibition. During cardiac specification, reduction of FGF signaling inhibits formation of both ventricular and atrial cardiomyocytes, with a stronger impact on ventricular cells. After cardiomyocyte differentiation begins, reduction of FGF signaling can still result in a deficiency of ventricular cardiomyocytes. Consistent with two temporally distinct roles for FGF, we find that increased FGF signaling induces a cardiomyocyte surplus only before cardiac differentiation begins. Thus, FGF signaling first regulates heart size and chamber proportionality during cardiac specification and later refines ventricular proportion by regulating cell number after the onset of differentiation. Together, our data demonstrate that a single signaling pathway can act reiteratively to coordinate Organ size and proportion. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据