4.1 Review

Transforming growth factor β2 is negatively regulated by endogenous retinoic acid during early heart morphogenesis

期刊

DEVELOPMENT GROWTH & DIFFERENTIATION
卷 52, 期 5, 页码 433-455

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-169X.2010.01183.x

关键词

cardiovascular morphogenesis; quail embryo; transforming growth factor beta 2; vitamin A

资金

  1. NIH [5R01 HL61982-03]
  2. National Research Initiative of the USDA Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service [2000-35200- 9062, 2005- 35200-15257]
  3. Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station
  4. American Heart Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vitamin A-deficient (VAD) quail embryos lack the vitamin A-active form, retinoic acid (RA) and are characterized by a phenotype that includes a grossly abnormal cardiovascular system that can be rescued by RA. Here we report that the transforming growth factor, TGF beta 2 is involved in RA-regulated cardiovascular development. In VAD embryos TGF beta 2 mRNA and protein expression are greatly elevated. The expression of TGF beta receptor II is also elevated in VAD embryos but is normalized by treatment with TGF beta 2-specific antisense oligonucleotides (AS). Administration of this AS or an antibody specific for TGF beta 2 to VAD embryos normalizes posterior heart development and vascularization, while the administration of exogenous active TGF beta 2 protein to normal quail embryos mimics the excessive TGF beta 2 status of VAD embryos and induces VAD cardiovascular phenotype. In VAD embryos pSmad2/3 and pErk1 are not activated, while pErk2 and pcRaf are elevated and pSmad1/5/8 is diminished. We conclude that in the early avian embryo TGF beta 2 has a major role in the retinoic acid-regulated posterior heart morphogenesis for which it does not use Smad2/3 pathways, but may use other signaling pathways. Importantly, we conclude that retinoic acid is a critical negative physiological regulator of the magnitude of TGF beta 2 signals during vertebrate heart formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据