4.1 Article

NK homeobox genes with choanocyte-specific expression in homoscleromorph sponges

期刊

DEVELOPMENT GENES AND EVOLUTION
卷 218, 期 9, 页码 479-489

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00427-008-0242-z

关键词

Porifera; choanocyte; homeobox; cell differentiation; ANTP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Data on nonbilaterian animals (sponges, cnidarians, and ctenophores) have suggested that Antennapedia (ANTP) class homeobox genes played a crucial role in the early diversification of animal body plans. Estimates of ancestral gene diversity within this important class of developmental regulators have been mostly based on recent analyses of the complete genome of a demosponge species, leading to the proposal that all ANTP families found in nonsponges animals (eumetazoans) derived from an ancestral proto-NK six-gene cluster. However, a single sponge species cannot reveal ancestral metazoan traits, in particular because lineage-specific gene duplications or losses are likely to have occurred during the long history of the Porifera. We thus looked for ANTP genes by degenerate polymerase chain reaction search in five species belonging to the Homoscleromorpha, a sponge lineage recently phylogenetically classified outside demosponges and characterized by unique histological features. We identified new genes of the ANTP class called HomoNK. Our phylogenetic analyses placed HomoNK (without significant support) close to the NK6 and NK7 families of cnidarian and bilaterian ANTP genes and did not recover the monophyly of the proposed proto-NK cluster. Our expression analyses of the HomoNK gene OlobNK in adult Oscarella lobularis showed that this gene is a strict marker of choanocytes, the most typical sponge cell type characterized by an apical flagellum surrounded by a collar of microvilli. These results are discussed in the light of the predominant neurosensory expression of NK6 and NK7 genes in bilaterians and of the recent proposal that choanocytes could be the sponge homologs of sensory cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据