4.7 Article

Midface and upper airway dysgenesis in FGFR2-related craniosynostosis involves multiple tissue-specific and cell cycle effects

期刊

DEVELOPMENT
卷 145, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.166488

关键词

Apert syndrome; Crouzon syndrome; Midface dysgenesis; Fibroblast growth factor; Nasal cartilage; Suture; Mouse

资金

  1. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research [R01 DE022988, U01 DE024448, R01 DE027677]
  2. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [P01 HD078233]
  3. National Institutes of Health Office of Research Infrastructure Programs [S10 OD018522]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Midface dysgenesis is a feature ofmore than 200 genetic conditions in which upper airway anomalies frequently cause respiratory distress, but its etiology is poorly understood. Mouse models of Apert and Crouzon craniosynostosis syndromes exhibit midface dysgenesis similar to the human conditions. They carry activating mutations of Fgfr2, which is expressed in multiple craniofacial tissues during development. Magnetic resonance microscopy of three mouse models of Apert and Crouzon syndromes revealed decreased nasal passage volume in all models at birth. Histological analysis suggested overgrowth of the nasal cartilage in the two Apert syndrome mouse models. We used tissue-specific gene expression and transcriptome analysis to further dissect the structural, cellular and molecular alterations underlying midface and upper airway dysgenesis in Apert Fgfr2(+/S252W) mutants. Cartilage thickened progressively during embryogenesis because of increased chondrocyte proliferation in the presence of Fgf2. Oral epithelium expression of mutant Fgfr2, which resulted in a distinctive nasal septal fusion defect, and premature facial suture fusion contributed to the overall dysmorphology. Midface dysgenesis in Fgfr2-related craniosynostosis is a complex phenotype arising fromthe combined effects of aberrant signaling in multiple craniofacial tissues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据