4.7 Article

Cadherin-based adhesions in the apical endfoot are required for active Notch signaling to control neurogenesis in vertebrates

期刊

DEVELOPMENT
卷 141, 期 8, 页码 1671-1682

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.102988

关键词

Notch signaling; Adherens junction; Neurogenesis; Neural stem/progenitor cell; Apical endfoot; Cadherin; Mouse; Chick

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan
  2. RIKEN CDB
  3. Joint Usage/Research Center of Institute for Virus Research at Kyoto University
  4. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  5. Kumamoto University GCOE program
  6. postdoctoral fellowship from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25111701, 22123002, 24570228] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of the vertebrate brain requires an exquisite balance between proliferation and differentiation of neural progenitors. Notch signaling plays a pivotal role in regulating this balance, yet the interaction between signaling and receiving cells remains poorly understood. We have found that numerous nascent neurons and/or intermediate neurogenic progenitors expressing the ligand of Notch retain apical endfeet transiently at the ventricular lumen that form adherens junctions (AJs) with the endfeet of progenitors. Forced detachment of the apical endfeet of those differentiating cells by disrupting AJs resulted in precocious neurogenesis that was preceded by the downregulation of Notch signaling. Both Notch1 and its ligand Dll1 are distributed around AJs in the apical endfeet, and these proteins physically interact with ZO-1, a constituent of the AJ. Furthermore, live imaging of a fluorescently tagged Notch1 demonstrated its trafficking from the apical endfoot to the nucleus upon cleavage. Our results identified the apical endfoot as the central site of active Notch signaling to securely prohibit inappropriate differentiation of neural progenitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据