4.7 Article

Loss of focal adhesions in glia disrupts both glial and photoreceptor axon migration in the Drosophila visual system

期刊

DEVELOPMENT
卷 141, 期 15, 页码 3072-3083

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.101972

关键词

Integrin; Talin; Glia; Optic stalk; Eye; Axon stalling

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP-123420]
  2. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN 227814-06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many aspects of glial development are regulated by extracellular signals, including those from the extracellular matrix (ECM). Signals from the ECM are received by cell surface receptors, including the integrin family. Previously, we have shown that Drosophila integrins form adhesion complexes with Integrin-linked kinase and talin in the peripheral nerve glia and have conserved roles in glial sheath formation. However, integrin function in other aspects of glial development is unclear. The Drosophila eye imaginal disc (ED) and optic stalk (OS) complex is an excellent model with which to study glial migration, differentiation and glia-neuron interactions. We studied the roles of the integrin complexes in these glial developmental processes during OS/eye development. The common beta subunit beta PS and two alpha subunits, alpha PS2 and alpha PS3, are located in puncta at both glia-glia and glia-ECM interfaces. Depletion of beta PS integrin and talin by RNAi impaired the migration and distribution of glia within the OS resulting in morphological defects. Reduction of integrin or talin in the glia also disrupted photoreceptor axon outgrowth leading to axon stalling in the OS and ED. The neuronal defects were correlated with a disruption of the carpet glia tube paired with invasion of glia into the core of the OS and the formation of a glial cap. Our results suggest that integrin-mediated extracellular signals are important for multiple aspects of glial development and non-autonomously affect axonal migration during Drosophila eye development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据