4.7 Article

Integrin αvβ3 and thyroid hormones promote expansion of progenitors in embryonic neocortex

期刊

DEVELOPMENT
卷 141, 期 4, 页码 795-806

出版社

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.101907

关键词

Cortical neurogenesis; Integrins; Thyroid hormones; Mouse

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SFB 655, A2, TRR 83, Tp6]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) [250197]
  3. Fonds der Chemischen Industrie

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neocortex expansion during evolution is associated with the enlargement of the embryonic subventricular zone, which reflects an increased self-renewal and proliferation of basal progenitors. In contrast to human, the vast majority of mouse basal progenitors lack self-renewal capacity, possibly due to lack of a basal process contacting the basal lamina and downregulation of cell-autonomous production of extracellular matrix (ECM) constituents. Here we show that targeted activation of the ECM receptor integrin alpha(v)beta(3) on basal progenitors in embryonic mouse neocortex promotes their expansion. Specifically, integrin alpha(v)beta(3) activation causes an increased cell cycle re-entry of Pax6-negative, Tbr2-positive intermediate progenitors, rather than basal radial glia, and a decrease in the proportion of intermediate progenitors committed to neurogenic division. Interestingly, integrin alpha(v)beta(3) is the only known cell surface receptor for thyroid hormones. Remarkably, tetrac, a thyroid hormone analog that inhibits the binding of thyroid hormones to integrin alpha(v)beta(3), completely abolishes the intermediate progenitor expansion observed upon targeted integrin alpha(v)beta(3) activation, indicating that this expansion requires the binding of thyroid hormones to integrin alpha(v)beta(3). Convergence of ECM and thyroid hormones on integrin alpha(v)beta(3) thus appears to be crucial for cortical progenitor proliferation and self-renewal, and hence for normal brain development and the evolutionary expansion of the neocortex.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据