4.7 Article

Architecture of a lymphomyeloid developmental switch controlled by PU.1, Notch and Gata3

期刊

DEVELOPMENT
卷 140, 期 6, 页码 1207-1219

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.088559

关键词

Gene regulatory network; Lineage decision; Myb; Quantitative gene expression analysis; T-cell development; Sfpi1; Mouse

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [CA90233, CA90233-08S1]
  2. Garfinkle Memorial Laboratory Fund
  3. Al Sherman Foundation
  4. NIH [T32GM07616]
  5. Albert Billings Ruddock Biology Professorship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hematopoiesis is a classic system with which to study developmental potentials and to investigate gene regulatory networks that control choices among alternate lineages. T-cell progenitors seeding the thymus retain several lineage potentials. The transcription factor PU.1 is involved in the decision to become a T cell or a myeloid cell, and the developmental outcome of expressing PU.1 is dependent on exposure to Notch signaling. PU.1-expressing T-cell progenitors without Notch signaling often adopt a myeloid program, whereas those exposed to Notch signals remain in a T-lineage pathway. Here, we show that Notch signaling does not alter PU.1 transcriptional activity by degradation/alteration of PU.1 protein. Instead, Notch signaling protects against the downregulation of T-cell factors so that a T-cell transcriptional network is maintained. Using an early T-cell line, we describe two branches of this network. The first involves inhibition of E-proteins by PU.1 and the resulting inhibition of Notch signaling target genes. Effects of E-protein inhibition can be reversed by exposure to Notch signaling. The second network is dependent on the ability of PU.1 to inhibit important T-cell transcription factor genes such as Myb, Tcf7 and Gata3 in the absence of Notch signaling. We show that maintenance of Gata3 protein levels by Myb and Notch signaling is linked to the ability to retain T-cell identity in response to PU.1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据