4.7 Article

Fibroblast growth factor signalling controls successive cell behaviours during mesoderm layer formation in Drosophila

期刊

DEVELOPMENT
卷 138, 期 13, 页码 2705-2715

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.060277

关键词

Cell signalling; Gastrulation; Cell migration; E-cadherin; Fibroblast growth factor; Drosophila

资金

  1. MRC Non-Clinical Senior Fellowship [GO0501679]
  2. MRC [GO0901020]
  3. College of Life Sciences, University of Dundee
  4. MRC [G0901020, G0501679] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [G0501679, G0901020] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-dependent epithelial-mesenchymal transitions and cell migration contribute to the establishment of germ layers in vertebrates and other animals, but a comprehensive demonstration of the cellular activities that FGF controls to mediate these events has not been provided for any system. The establishment of the Drosophila mesoderm layer from an epithelial primordium involves a transition to a mesenchymal state and the dispersal of cells away from the site of internalisation in a FGF-dependent fashion. We show here that FGF plays multiple roles at successive stages of mesoderm morphogenesis in Drosophila. It is first required for the mesoderm primordium to lose its epithelial polarity. An intimate, FGF-dependent contact is established and maintained between the germ layers through mesoderm cell protrusions. These protrusions extend deep into the underlying ectoderm epithelium and are associated with high levels of E-cadherin at the germ layer interface. Finally, FGF directs distinct hitherto unrecognised and partially redundant protrusive behaviours during later mesoderm spreading. Cells first move radially towards the ectoderm, and then switch to a dorsally directed movement across its surface. We show that both movements are important for layer formation and present evidence suggesting that they are controlled by genetically distinct mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据