4.7 Article

Initiation of trophectoderm lineage specification in mouse embryos is independent of Cdx2

期刊

DEVELOPMENT
卷 137, 期 24, 页码 4159-4169

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.056630

关键词

Cdx2; Trophectoderm; Lineage specification; Preimplantation mouse embryos

资金

  1. Max Planck Society
  2. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development [NIH R01HD059946-01]
  3. DFG [FOR 1041 SCHO 340/7-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The separation of the first two lineages - trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM) - is a crucial event in the development of the early embryo. The ICM, which constitutes the pluripotent founder cell population, develops into the embryo proper, whereas the TE, which comprises the surrounding outer layer, supports the development of the ICM before and after implantation. Cdx2, the first transcription factor expressed specifically in the developing TE, is crucial for the differentiation of cells into the TE, as lack of zygotic Cdx2 expression leads to a failure of embryos to hatch and implant into the uterus. However, speculation exists as to whether maternal Cdx2 is required for initiation of TE lineage separation. Here, we show that effective elimination of both maternal and zygotic Cdx2 transcripts by an RNA interference approach resulted in failure of embryo hatching and implantation, but the developing blastocysts exhibited normal gross morphology, indicating that TE differentiation had been initiated. Expression of keratin 8, a marker for differentiated TE, further confirmed the identity of the TE lineage in Cdx2-deficient embryos. However, these embryos exhibited low mitochondrial activity and abnormal ultrastructure, indicating that Cdx2 plays a key role in the regulation of TE function. Furthermore, we found that embryonic compaction does not act as a 'switch' regulator to turn on Cdx2 expression. Our results clearly demonstrate that neither maternal nor zygotic Cdx2 transcripts direct the initiation of ICM/TE lineage separation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据