4.7 Article

Regulation of membrane trafficking and organ separation by the NEVERSHED ARF-GAP protein

期刊

DEVELOPMENT
卷 136, 期 11, 页码 1909-1918

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.033605

关键词

Membrane trafficking; ARF-GAP; Abscission; Floral organ shedding; Flower development; Arabidopsis; Golgi; Paramural; Exosome

资金

  1. NSF grant
  2. UNC
  3. NSF
  4. USDA
  5. HHMI
  6. William R. Kenan Fellowship
  7. UNC Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology
  8. UNC Developmental Biology
  9. Intramural Program of the National Cancer Institute,
  10. Department of Health and Human Services
  11. Direct For Biological Sciences
  12. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [0817544] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cell separation, or abscission, is a highly specialized process in plants that facilitates remodeling of their architecture and reproductive success. Because few genes are known to be essential for organ abscission, we conducted a screen for mutations that alter floral organ shedding in Arabidopsis. Nine recessive mutations that block shedding were found to disrupt the function of an ADP-ribosylation factor-GTPase-activating protein (ARF-GAP) we have named NEVERSHED (NEV). As predicted by its homology to the yeast Age2 ARF-GAP and transcriptional profile, NEV influences other aspects of plant development, including fruit growth. Co-localization experiments carried out with NEV-specific antiserum and a set of plant endomembrane markers revealed that NEV localizes to the trans-Golgi network and endosomes in Arabidopsis root epidermal cells. Interestingly, transmission electron micrographs of abscission zone regions from wild-type and nev flowers reveal defects in the structure of the Golgi apparatus and extensive accumulation of vesicles adjacent to the cell walls. Our results suggest that NEV ARF-GAP activity at the trans-Golgi network and distinct endosomal compartments is required for the proper trafficking of cargo molecules required for cell separation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据