4.7 Article

GFAPδ in radial glia and subventricular zone progenitors in the developing human cortex

期刊

DEVELOPMENT
卷 137, 期 2, 页码 313-321

出版社

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.041632

关键词

GFAP; Radial glia; Human brain development; Neural progenitors; Lissencephaly

资金

  1. Internationale Stichting Alzheimer Onderzoek (ISAO) [04511]
  2. NWO-ALW-Vici
  3. Hersenstichting Nederland (HsN) [13F05]
  4. National Epilepsy Fund (NEF) [05-11, 09-05]
  5. EU [202167]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A subpopulation of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-expressing cells located along the length of the lateral ventricles in the subventricular zone (SVZ) have been identified as the multipotent neural stem cells of the adult mammalian brain. We have previously found that, in the adult human brain, a splice variant of GFAP, termed GFAP delta, was expressed specifically in these cells. To investigate whether GFAP delta is also present in the precursors of SVZ astrocytes during development and whether GFAP delta could play a role in the developmental process, we analyzed GFAP delta expression in the normal developing human cortex and in the cortex of foetuses with the migration disorder lissencephaly type II. We demonstrated for the first time that GFAP delta is specifically expressed in radial glia and SVZ neural progenitors during human brain development. Expression of GFAP delta in radial glia starts at around 13 weeks of pregnancy and disappears before birth. GFAP delta is continuously expressed in the SVZ progenitors at later gestational ages and in the postnatal brain. Co-localization with Ki67 proved that these GFAP delta-expressing cells are able to proliferate. Furthermore, we showed that the expression pattern of GFAP delta was disturbed in lissencephaly type II. Overall, these results suggest that the adult SVZ is indeed a remnant of the foetal SVZ, which develops from radial glia. Furthermore, we provide evidence that GFAP delta can distinguish resting astrocytes from proliferating SVZ progenitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据