4.7 Article

Single-cell gene profiling defines differential progenitor subclasses in mammalian neurogenesis

期刊

DEVELOPMENT
卷 135, 期 18, 页码 3113-3124

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.022616

关键词

cortical development; neurogenesis; single-cell cDNA; neural progenitors; Notch signaling

资金

  1. Japan Science and Technology Agency
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [15700264, 18680030]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18680030, 15700264] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cellular diversity of the brain is largely attributed to the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of progenitor cells. In mammalian cerebral development, it has been difficult to determine how heterogeneous the neural progenitor cells are, owing to dynamic changes in their nuclear position and gene expression. To address this issue, we systematically analyzed the cDNA profiles of a large number of single progenitor cells at the mid-embryonic stage in mouse. By cluster analysis and in situ hybridization, we have identified a set of genes that distinguishes between the apical and basal progenitors. Despite their relatively homogeneous global gene expression profiles, the apical progenitors exhibit highly variable expression patterns of Notch signaling components, raising the possibility that this causes the heterogeneous division patterns of these cells. Furthermore, we successfully captured the nascent state of basal progenitor cells. These cells are generated shortly after birth from the division of the apical progenitors, and show strong expression of the major Notch ligand delta-like 1, which soon fades away as the cells migrate in the ventricular zone. We also demonstrated that attenuation of Notch signals immediately induces differentiation of apical progenitors into nascent basal progenitors. Thus, a Notch-dependent feedback loop is likely to be in operation to maintain both progenitor populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据