4.7 Article

Teashirt 3 is necessary for ureteral smooth muscle differentiation downstream of SHH and BMP4

期刊

DEVELOPMENT
卷 135, 期 19, 页码 3301-3310

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.022442

关键词

gene targeting; teashirt 3 (Tshz3); UPJO; ureter; smooth muscle

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  2. British Council
  3. The Company of Biologists
  4. Egide Alliance Program
  5. Association Francaise contre les Myopathies and Kids Kidney Research
  6. Kidney Research UK [SF1/2008] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ureteric contractions propel foetal urine from the kidney to the urinary bladder. Here, we show that mouse ureteric smooth muscle cell (SMC) precursors express the transcription factor teashirt 3 (TSHZ3), and that Tshz3-null mutant mice have congenital hydronephrosis without anatomical obstruction. Ex vivo, the spontaneous contractions that occurred in proximal segments of wildtype embryonic ureter explants were absent in Tshz3 mutant ureters. In vivo, prior to the onset of hydronephrosis, mutant proximal ureters failed to express contractile SMC markers, whereas these molecules were detected in controls. Mutant embryonic ureters expressed Shh and Bmp4 transcripts as normal, with appropriate expression of Ptch1 and pSMAD1/5/8 in target SM precursors, whereas myocardin, a key regulator for SMC differentiation, was not expressed in Tshz3-null ureters. In wild-type embryonic renal tract explants, exogenous BMP4 upregulated Tshz3 and myocardin expression. More interestingly, in Tshz3 mutant renal tract explants, exogenous BMP4 did not improve the Tshz3 phenotype. Thus, Tshz3 is required for proximal ureteric SMC differentiation downstream of SHH and BMP4. Furthermore, the Tshz3 mutant mouse model of 'functional' urinary obstruction resembles congenital pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction, a common human malformation, suggesting that TSHZ, or related, gene variants may contribute to this disorder.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据