4.4 Review

The Surgical Treatment of Hepatic Metastases in Colorectal Carcinoma

期刊

DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL
卷 107, 期 19, 页码 335-U11

出版社

DEUTSCHER AERZTE-VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0335

关键词

-

资金

  1. Novartis
  2. Astellas
  3. Roche
  4. Pfizer
  5. Merck
  6. Wyeth

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Colorectal carcinoma with hepatic metastases was long considered an incurable disease. Recent advances in surgical treatment have substantially improved the affected patients' prognosis. At first, surgery was only performed in patients whose hepatic tumor burden was small (< 4 nodes, < 5 cm). Currently, however, the main issue is the feasibility of curative resection of all metastases. Method: The PubMed literature database was selectively searched for articles with the keywords colorectal liver metastases, chemotherapy, and surgery. Particular attention was devoted to studies of large groups of patients, randomized trials, the German guidelines, and an analysis of the authors' own patient population. Results: Only 10% to 20% of all patients are candidates for surgical therapy (hepatic resection), as the rest are disqualified either by extensive liver involvement or by extrahepatic neoplasia. A further 10% of patients have hepatic metastases that are primarily considered inoperable, yet later become amenable to surgery after interdisciplinary treatment involving preoperative chemotherapy, portal-vein embolization, two-stage hepatectomy, and/or locally ablative procedures. Chemotherapy is probably beneficial after hepatic resection, although the benefit has not yet been definitively demonstrated by clinical trials. Therefore, chemotherapy should only be given perioperatively in selected cases, when recommended by an interdisciplinary treatment team. Conclusion: A multimodal approach to the treatment of hepatic metastases of colorectal carcinoma has led to an increase in the number of resections and to an improved long-term survival rate (currently more than 40% at 5 years).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据