期刊
DESIGN STUDIES
卷 30, 期 1, 页码 60-68出版社
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2008.09.001
关键词
reflective practice; design history; philosophy of design; design cognition; logic of design
In this paper, I examine Schon's criticism of Herbert Simon's instrumentalist theory of design and conclude that Schon's evaluation of Simon's theory of design, based on the first edition of The Sciences or the Artificial, overlooks many open-ended constructivist trajectories. By exploring later editions of The Sciences or the Artificial, the hope is to correct the misconception that Simon's substantive theory of design had very little to contribute to research studies in designerly ways of knowing. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据