4.3 Article

Doehlert design as optimization approach for the removal of Pb(II) from aqueous solution by Catalpa Speciosa tree leaves: adsorption characterization

期刊

DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT
卷 53, 期 2, 页码 430-445

出版社

DESALINATION PUBL
DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2013.853625

关键词

Desirability function; Catalpa speciosa; Pb(II); Potentiometric titration; Doehlert design

资金

  1. Research and Technology Center of Arak University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Catalpa speciosa tree leaves were used to remove Pb(II) from aqueous solutions. Removal process was optimized by applying experimental design strategy. Optimization was based on the application of a two-level full-factorial design for screening the significant variables followed by a Doehlert design to find out an appropriate model which leads to determine the optimum conditions. The empirical models were developed in terms of effective factors: pH, initial concentration of metal ion C-m and sorbent mass(s) have been found statistically adequate to describe the process responses, that is, removal percent and the capacity uptake of Pb(II). The multiresponse optimization of Pb(II) removal process has been carried out using desirability function approach. To this end, Derringer's desirability function (D) has been applied for mathematical optimization of the simultaneous multiresponse problem. Thus, the optimum conditions of Pb(II) removal process have been found as: pH=4.43, s=0.07 g, and C-m=104 mg L-1. Responses were confirmed by experiments 86 and 14.7 mg g(-1) for R% and q, respectively. The morphology and structure of biosorbent during adsorption process was characterized by FT-IR spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy techniques. Experimental data were also fitted to various isotherm models. Potentiometric titration, pH(PZC), and the competitive effect of alkaline and alkaline earth metal ions during the loading of Pb(II) indicate that ion exchange is the predominant mechanism for the adsorption of Pb(II) by C. speciosa tree leaves.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据