4.3 Article

Verification of tropical cyclone heat potential for tropical cyclone intensity forecasting in the Western North Pacific

期刊

JOURNAL OF OCEANOGRAPHY
卷 71, 期 4, 页码 373-387

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10872-015-0298-0

关键词

Tropical cyclone intensity forecast; Tropical cyclone deepening; Tropical cyclone heat potential; 26 degrees C isothermal depth; Ocean data assimilation; Profiling float

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [15K05292]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K05292] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tropical cyclone heat potential (TCHP) is a measurable metric calculated by the summation of ocean heat content from the surface down to the depth of the 26 A degrees C isotherm. TCHP calculated by the Meteorological Research Institute multivariate ocean variational estimation (MOVE) system is verified by using TCHP based on in situ observations by profiling floats during 2002-2012. After the verification, the threshold of MOVE-based TCHP before the passage of a tropical cyclone (TC) favorable for triggering TC deepening is determined by best-track central pressure drops for the nearest 6 hours from 1985 to 2012. The threshold is specified as the minimum range of TCHP when the ratio of the number of records for TC deepening to the total best-track number of records in a TCHP bin is significantly greater than the reference ratio determined for each domain at a significance level of 0.05. The threshold is relatively low (40-60 kJ cm(-2)) around 5-10A degrees N, west of 120A degrees E and east of 140A degrees E, whereas it is relatively high (80-100 kJ cm(-2)) around 15-20A degrees N. Around 5-10A degrees N, the ratio for each moving speed shows two peaks: with moving speeds of 3-5 and 7-9 m s(-1). The former case is exemplified by Typhoon Mike (1990) under relatively low TCHP (< 80 kJ cm(-2)), whereas the latter case is exemplified by Typhoon Haiyan (2013), which is more rapidly intensified and reaches a lower minimum central pressure under relatively high TCHP (> 120 kJ cm(-2)).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据