4.7 Article

Fouling control by threshold flux measurements in the treatment of different olive mill wastewater streams by membranes-in-series process

期刊

DESALINATION
卷 343, 期 -, 页码 162-168

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.10.002

关键词

Olive vegetation wastewater; Modeling; Fouling; Nanofiltration; Ultrafiltration; Wastewater reclamation

资金

  1. European project PHOTOMEM [FP7-SME-2011, 262470]
  2. European project ETOILE [FP7-SME-2007-1, 222331]
  3. EC
  4. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [CTQ2007-66178, CTQ2010-21411]
  5. University of Granada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper deals with the measurement of the critical and threshold flux for modelization, prediction and control of the fouling issues of batch membranes-in-series processes, in detail ultrafiltration (UF) followed by nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO), for the reclamation of olive mill wastewater (OMW-2). Results suggest the existence of threshold flux values for both UF and NF membranes, with minimum constant fouling attained on the latter, that is 54.5% lower. UF + NF in series after pH-T flocculation process followed by photocatalysis with ferromagnetic-core titanium dioxide under ultraviolet irradiation (UV/TiO2) as pretreatment to inhibit fouling issues guarantees COD values in the permeate of 1.3 g L-1. This value complies with irrigation water quality standards. Moreover, the adoption of this treatment sequence helps reducing the required membrane area, equal to 104.6 m(2) and 81.4 m(2) for the UF and NF membranes, respectively, leading to a limited need of overdesign of the membrane plant. In addition, especially the use of the applied UV/TiO2 photocatalysis process not only enhances the productivity but also ensures minimization of the constant fouling build-up on both membranes. This latter effect sensibly increases the longevity of the membranes, reducing the capital and operating costs of the treatment. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据