4.7 Article

Phosphate removal from urine using hybrid anion exchange resin

期刊

DESALINATION
卷 322, 期 -, 页码 104-112

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.05.014

关键词

Diclofenac; Hydrated ferric oxide; Ion-exchange; Nutrient recovery; Phosphorus; Urine source separation

资金

  1. NSF CAREER grant [CBET-1150790]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1713704] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1150790] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Urine source separation has been proposed as a more sustainable approach to wastewater management than treating combined wastewater streams. One such benefit of urine source separation is nutrient recovery, which has primarily focused on struvite precipitation for recovery of phosphorus. There is no previous research investigating phosphorus recovery from human urine by ion-exchange. Accordingly, the goal of this research was to provide an improved understanding of phosphate removal by ion-exchange using a hybrid anion exchange (HAIX) resin. The specific objectives of this research were to evaluate phosphate removal using HAIX resin in fresh urine and hydrolyzed urine in terms of (1) kinetic tests, (2) equilibrium tests, (3) sorption models, (4) competition among sulfate, chloride, and phosphate, and (5) pharmaceutical co-removal. Batch experiments were conducted using different compositions of synthetic urine. HAD: resin consisted of a strong-base anion exchange resin impregnated with hydrated ferric oxide nanoparticles. The major results of phosphate removal from urine using HAIX resin were rapid removal in 5 min or less, high removal up to 97%, similar ion-exchange behavior in fresh urine and hydrolyzed urine, no affect by sulfate on phosphate removal, and co-removal of pharmaceutical and phosphate. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据