4.7 Article

Pollutant removal mechanisms in a bio-diatomite dynamic membrane reactor for micro-polluted surface water purification

期刊

DESALINATION
卷 293, 期 -, 页码 38-45

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2012.02.021

关键词

Bio-diatomite dynamic membrane; Water head; Adsorption; Interception; Microbial community

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51138009]
  2. Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, China [PCRRY11015]
  3. project of the Science and Technology commission of Shanghai municipality [11dz1211202]
  4. National Key Technologies R D Program [2012BAJ25B02, 2012BAJ25B04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The bio-diatomite dynamic membrane (BDDM) reactor is an emerging micro-polluted surface water treatment technology that combines diatomite (the microorganism carrier) and a stainless steel mesh (the dynamic membrane support module). A constant water head of 20 cm was designed to drive the BDDM filtration. The BDDM with sintered diatomite had good water penetration capacity, a filtration flux as high as 92 L/m(2) h after a filtration time of 15,780 min, and an effluent turbidity in the range of 0.15 NTU-0.20 NTU. The BDDM reactor effectively removed organic matter and ammonium nitrogen. The diatomite adsorption and the BDDM interception did not have high pollutant removal efficiencies. The dehydrogenase activity (DNA) of the bio-diatomite was in the range of 2.27-3.20 (mg TF)/(gVSS) h, indicating good microorganism activity for organic matter removal. The PCR-DGGE analysis showed that the microbial community was very abundant. Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria (e.g. alpha-, beta-, -gamma-proteobacteria), Verrucomicrobia, and Nitrospirae were dominant in the bio-diatomite mixed liquor and removed organic matter and ammonium nitrogen. The microbial degradation of pollutants by the bio-diatomite mixed liquor was primarily responsible for the pollutant removal in the BDDM reactor. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据