4.7 Article

Preparation and characterization of negatively charged hollow fiber nanofiltration membrane by plasma-induced graft polymerization

期刊

DESALINATION
卷 286, 期 -, 页码 138-144

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.11.014

关键词

Negatively charged; Hollow fiber; Nanofiltration (NF) membrane; Plasma; 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonic acid (AMPS)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51078264]
  2. Basic Applied and Forefront Technology Research Projects of Tianjin [09JCZDJC23200]
  3. Special Innovation Fund Project of Tianjin Science and Technology [10FDZDSW01500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new negatively charged nanofiltration (NF) membrane has been prepared by grafting of 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonic acid (AMPS) on the polysulfone (PSf) hollow fiber ultrafiltration membrane using two-step plasma method. First, PSf substrate was pretreated by plasma. Then, the pretreated membrane was soaked in AMPS solution and the loaded monomer was grafted on the membrane by plasma-induced. ATR-FTIR. FESEM. water contact angle (WCA) and breaking strength were employed to characterize the structural and morphological changes of membranes. The effects of pretreatment time, AMPS concentration and grafting reaction time on the membrane performances were studied. In addition, the rejections to single salt solutions and mixed salt solutions were examined. The results indicated that the pretreatment of PSf substrate played an important role in the preparation of this NF membrane. The NF membrane, pretreated for 30s and grafted for 80s with 5% AMPS solution, showed a rejection to 1 g/L Na2SO4 of 80.8 +/- 1.2% with a permeate flux of 6.4 +/- 0.2 L m(-2) h(-1) at 0.2 MPa and at 23 +/- 1 degrees C. The rejection sequence of single salts was Na2SO4 > MgSO4 > NaCl > MgCl2. And the negatively charged NF membrane showed a better selectivity to SO42-, than Cl- in a mixed salt solution. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据