4.7 Article

Preparation and characterization of PVDF/TiO2 mixed matrix membrane via in situ colloidal precipitation method

期刊

DESALINATION
卷 295, 期 -, 页码 61-69

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2012.03.019

关键词

Mixed matrix membrane; Fouling resistance; TiO2 dispersion; Colloidal precipitation method; Phase inversion; Particle size distribution

资金

  1. Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) Research University Grant [1001/PJKIMIA/811172]
  2. Malaysia Toray Science Foundation (MTSF) Science and Technology Research Grant [304/PJKIMIA/6050179/M126]
  3. USM Membrane Science and Technology Cluster

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles (NPs) were incorporated into polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane to produce a mixed matrix membrane via phase inversion and colloidal precipitation method. In order to avoid agglomeration and to maintain the stability of NPs in the coagulation bath, NPs were dispersed in the bath via sonication and peptization. The membrane surface morphology and distribution pattern of NPs on the membrane surface were observed by field emission scanning electron microscopy. It was found that the NP size and distribution of NPs on the membrane surface were affected to a very great extent by the type of solvent used in the dope formulation and concentration of TiO2 in the coagulation bath. Membrane prepared using N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) as solvent has smaller surface particles and narrower particle size distribution compared to N-N-dimethylacetamide (DMAc) and N,N-dimethyl formamide (DMF) due to the hydrophobic/hydrophilic interactions between NPs and polymer solution. However, the pore size of membrane prepared using NMP was relatively big, thus resulted in poorer humic acid (HA) rejection. PVDF/TiO2 mixed matrix membrane using DMAc as solvent with 0.01 g/L of TiO2 in the coagulation bath exhibited extraordinary permeability (4321 L/m(2) h) with superior retention properties (98.28%) of humic acid. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据