4.7 Article

Recovery of nitrogen and phosphorus by struvite crystallization from swine wastewater

期刊

DESALINATION
卷 277, 期 1-3, 页码 364-369

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.04.056

关键词

Swine wastewater; MgCl2; Struvite; Metal ions; Heavy metal

资金

  1. Rural Development Administration (RDA), Korea
  2. Institute of Animal Resources at Kangwon National University
  3. Rural Development Administration (RDA), Republic of Korea [PJ00720520111134300] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Effects of the aeration rate and magnesium:phosphate (Mg:P) molar ratio on struvite crystallization in swine wastewater were investigated using a newly designed unit process. In addition, a feasible purification method to recover pure struvite from retrieved sediment and heavy metal content present in the recovered struvite was also examined. The process had reaction and settling zones and was operated in a continuous flow mode: the reaction time (RT) of the reaction zone was 4 h. Nine runs were conducted at different aeration rates and Mg:P ratios. Struvite formation was directly proportional to the aeration rate and reached a plateau at around 0.73 L/L.min of aeration. Struvite formation increased significantly ( P < 0.01) with increased Mg:P molar ratios and 0.8-1 was found to be optimum for enhancing struvite crystallization. The recovered sediment contained 19% total phosphorus (TP) and 15% total nitrogen (TN); 65% and 67% of TP and TN in the sediment were recovered in the pure struvite by redissolving and recrystallizing using acid and alkali solutions, respectively. The heavy metal content in the struvite was also reduced after purification. Struvite formation was later verified by analyzing the morphology and composition employing scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD), respectively. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据