4.7 Article

Study of the contribution of the main pollutants in the oilfield polymer-flooding wastewater to the critical flux

期刊

DESALINATION
卷 273, 期 2-3, 页码 375-385

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.01.054

关键词

Oilfield polymer-flooding wastewater; Critical flux; Fouling mechanism; Multivariate linear regression method; Average rates of change of the critical flux

资金

  1. Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation [8052006]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20276003]
  3. Beijing Municipal Commission of Education (China) [KM 200911417008, PHR 2009070105]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One of the major technical requirements of the crude oil exploitation industry is to minimize the concentration of hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM), crude oil and suspended solid (SS) in the oilfield polymer-flooding wastewater and realize the reuse of this wastewater. In this study, the membrane technology was used to achieve this goal in laboratory-scale dead-end test unit with flat polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (MW 100 kDa). We systematically inspected the membrane fouling mechanism, the variety of total membrane resistance, total fouling resistance, the dominant resistance, membrane fouling driving force and the filtration proceeds in the filtration process. The orthogonal method and multivariate linear regression method were applied to analyze the influencing degree of the main pollutant concentration on the critical flux. According to comparison of the average rates of change of the critical flux for the HPAM concentration, oil concentration and SS concentration in single solute solution, double solute solution and oilfield polymer-flooding wastewater, HPAM can decrease the average rate of change of the critical flux for other two solutes and has the crucial effect on the critical flux. The sequence of influence degree on the critical flux is the HPAM concentration (84.58%)>oil concentration (14.36%)>SS concentration (1.06%). (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据