4.6 Article

RECURRENCE OF MAJOR DEPRESSIVE EPISODES IS STRONGLY DEPENDENT ON THE NUMBER OF PREVIOUS EPISODES

期刊

DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY
卷 31, 期 1, 页码 72-76

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/da.22173

关键词

major depressive disorder; health survey; episode count; epidemiological studies; longitudinal studies

资金

  1. Clinical Research Unit of the Hotchkiss Brain Institute of the University of Calgary

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundA history of past major depressive episodes (MDEs) is known to be a risk factor for future MDEs. Additional information about the relationship between past and future episodes would be useful in clinical practice, it is therefore important to fully understand the epidemiology of major depression. We asked whether the number of previous MDEs is related to the probability of recurrence in the general population. MethodsData were used from the Canadian National Population Health Survey (NPHS) that was repeated every 2 years from 1994/1995 to 2009/2010 (i.e., nine cycles). Prior year depression was assessed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Short Form (CIDI-SF). We estimated the total number of MDEs in individuals over the first eight cycles and examined recurrence in the ninth cycle. These analyses employed a generalized linear model (identity link) where recurrence in cycle 9 was the outcome and the predictor variables were age, gender, and the number of MDEs in the first eight cycles. ResultsThe risk for recurrence of depression in cycle 9 was found to progressively increase with the number of prior episodes, reaching a value of greater than 46% when the number of prior episodes was five to eight. Independent of this association, the risk of recurrence was greater in younger people and women, but the strength of association of these variables was much weaker for past episodes. ConclusionsMDE recurrence strongly depended on the number of preceding episodes. Those at highest risk of recurrence can be easily identified by their number of past episodes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据