4.6 Article

REFINING AND VALIDATING THE SOCIAL INTERACTION ANXIETY SCALE AND THE SOCIAL PHOBIA SCALE

期刊

DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY
卷 26, 期 2, 页码 E71-E81

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/da.20480

关键词

social anxiety; social phobia; Social Interaction Anxiety Scale; Social Phobia Scale; confirmatory factor analysis

资金

  1. Canadian Institute of Health Research Investigator's Award
  2. Canadian Institute of Health Research Investigator's Graduate Scholarship Doctoral Research Award
  3. Canadian Institute of Health Research Investigator's Doctoral Research Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and Social Phobia Scale are companion measures for assessing symptoms of social anxiety and social phobia. The scales have good reliability and validity across several samples, however, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses have yielded solutions comprising substantially different item content and factor structures. These discrepancies are likely the result of analyzing items from each scale separately or simultaneously. The current investigation sets out to assess items from those scales, both simultaneously and separately, using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses in an effort to resolve the factor structure. Methods: Participants consisted of a clinical sample (n5353; 54% women) and an undergraduate sample (n5317; 75% women) who completed the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and Social Phobia Scale, along with additional fear-related measures to assess convergent and discriminant validity. Results: A three-factor solution with a reduced set of items was found to be most stable, irrespective of whether the items from each scale are assessed together or separately. Items from the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale represented one factor, whereas items from the Social Phobia Scale represented two other factors. Conclusion: Initial support for scale and factor validity, along with implications and recommendations for future research, is provided. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据