4.6 Article

Effect of the number of coloring liquid applications on the optical properties of monolithic zirconia

期刊

DENTAL MATERIALS
卷 30, 期 9, 页码 E229-E237

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.04.008

关键词

Zirconia-based ceramic; Color; Translucency; Opalescence; Spectrophotometry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. This study was aimed to investigate the effect of the number of coloring liquid applications on the optical properties of monolithic zirconia. Methods. Eighteen monolithic zirconia specimens (27.6 mm x 27.6 mm x 2.0 mm) were fabricated and divided into 6 groups (n = 3). Each group was designated by the number of A2-coloring liquid applications (Group I to Group V) and Group O as a control. Color and spectral distribution of the specimens were measured with a double-beam spectrophotometer. CIE L*, a* and b* relative to the standard illuminants D65 were measured in reflectance and transmittance modes. Color difference (Delta E-ab*), translucency parameter(TP) and opalescence parameter (OP) were calculated. All measurements were performed on five different areas of each specimen. All data were analyzed by ANOVA and multiple comparison Scheffe test, Pearson correlations and linear regression analysis (alpha = 0.05). Results. With the increase of the number of coloring liquid applications, CIE L* (R-2 = 0.878) and OP values (R-2 = 0.701) were decreased, but CIE b* (R-2 = 0.938) was increased. However, TP values were not significantly changed. The color differences among groups ranged from 1.3 to 15.7 Delta E-ab* units. Strong correlation was found between OP and Delta b* (R-2 = 0.982, P < .01). Significance. Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the number of coloring liquid applications with a single shade affects the lightness, yellow chromaticity and opalescence of monolithic zirconia, although its translucency cannot be controlled by the coloring procedure. (C) 2014 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据