4.6 Article

Low temperature sintering of fluorapatite glass-ceramics

期刊

DENTAL MATERIALS
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 112-121

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.10.009

关键词

Glass-ceramics; Fluorapatite; Akermanite; Crystallization; Sintering

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Dental Research, Bethesda, MD [R01-DE19972]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fluorapatite glass-ceramics have been shown to be excellent candidates as scaffold materials for bone grafts, however, scaffold production by sintering is hindered by concurrent crystallization of the glass. Objective, our goal was to investigate the effect of Ca/Al ratio on the sintering behavior of Nb-doped fluorapatite-based glasses in the SiO2-Al2O3-P2O(5)-MgO-Na2O-K2O-CaO-CaF2 system. Methods, glass compositions with Ca/Al ratio of 1 (A), 2 (B), 4 (C) and 19 (D) were prepared by twice melting at 1525 C for 3 h. Glasses were either cast as cylindrical ingots or ground into powders. Disk-shaped specimens were prepared by either sectioning from the ingots or powder-compacting in a mold, followed by heat treatment at temperatures ranging between 700 and 1050 C for 1 h. The density was measured on both sintered specimens and heat treated discs as controls. The degree of sintering was determined from these measurements. Results and Significance XRD showed that fluorapatite crystallized in all glass-ceramics. A high degree of sintering was achieved at 775 C for glass-ceramic D (98.99 +/- 0.04%), and 900 degrees C for glass-ceramic C (91.31 +/- 0.10). Glass-ceramics A or B were only partially sintered at 1000 C (63.6 +/- 0.8% and 74.1 +/- 1.5%, respectively). SEM revealed a unique microstructure of micron-sized spherulitic fluorapatite crystals in glass-ceramics C and D. Increasing the Ca/Al ratio promoted low temperature sintering of fluorapatite glass-ceramics, which are traditionally difficult to sinter. (C) 2013 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据